FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

Automatization in second language acquisition: What does the coefficient of variation tell us?

JAN H. HULSTIJN, AMOS VAN GELDEREN, ROB SCHOONEN

Applied Psycholinguistics, 2009. DOI 10.1017/s0142716409990014

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 successful. The earliest on record is from 2014.

Replications

• Automatization in second language sentence processing: A partial, conceptual replication of Hulstijn, Van Gelderen, and Schoonen's 2009 study, LIM & GODFROID (2014). Applied Psycholinguistics. Outcome recorded: successful. the CV in the sentence-level tasks decreased as participants' proficiency level increased. Outcome read from the abstract. View paper

Cite this record

HULSTIJN, J. H., VAN GELDEREN, A., & SCHOONEN, R. (2009). Automatization in second language acquisition: What does the coefficient of variation tell us? Applied Psycholinguistics, 30(4), 555–582. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716409990014

Other studies in the atlas

• The relationship between cognitive dysfunction and stress sensitivity in schizophrenia
• Automatization in second language sentence processing: A partial, conceptual replication…
• Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speed-up from automatization…
• Searching for the "native" speaker: A preregistered conceptual replication and extension…
• Optimal learning in a virtual patient simulation of cranial nerve palsies: The…
• Virtual patient simulations and optimal social learning context: A replication of an…

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages