FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

Regret salience and accountability in the decoy effect

Terry Connolly, Jochen Reb, Edgar E. Kausel

Judgment and Decision Making, 2013. DOI 10.1017/s1930297500005064

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 failed. The earliest on record is from 2020.

Replications

• Revisiting the decoy effect: replication and extension of Ariely and Wallsten (1995) and Connolly, Reb, and Kausel (2013)‎, Xiao et al. (2020). Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology. Outcome recorded: failed. We replicated the decoy effect in Study 2, yet with a much smaller effect size than in the original. In addition, we concluded inconclusive evidence for the central hypothesis of the original study that regret salience weakens the decoy effect. Outcome read from the abstract. View paper

Cite this record

Connolly, T., Reb, J., & Kausel, E. E. (2013). Regret salience and accountability in the decoy effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(2), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500005064

Other studies in the atlas

• Too arrogant for their own good? Why and when narcissists dismiss advice
• The state of coursework on horses in human services at universities and colleges in the…
• Who throws good money after bad? Action vs. state orientation moderates the sunk cost…
• Choosing, rejecting, and closely replicating, 30 years later: A commentary on…
• Revisiting the impact of singularity on the Identified Victim Effect: Replication and…
• The evaluability bias in charitable giving: Saving administration costs or saving lives?

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages