FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

Regret salience and accountability in the decoy effect

Terry Connolly, Jochen Reb, Edgar E. Kausel

Judgment and Decision Making, 2013. DOI 10.1017/s1930297500005064

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 mixed. The earliest on record is from 2020.

Replications

• Revisiting the decoy effect: replication and extension of Ariely and Wallsten (1995) and Connolly, Reb, and Kausel (2013)‎, Xiao et al. (2020). Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology. Outcome recorded: uninformative. Extending the replication in Study 2, we tested whether making salient the low reversibility of decisions can have a similar impact as regret salience. We again found indication for an effect in the predicted direction, yet the effect was too weak to be detected given our sample size. Outcome read from the abstract. View paper

Cite this record

Connolly, T., Reb, J., & Kausel, E. E. (2013). Regret salience and accountability in the decoy effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(2), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500005064

Other studies in the atlas

• The state of coursework on horses in human services at universities and colleges in the…
• Too arrogant for their own good? Why and when narcissists dismiss advice
• The evaluability bias in charitable giving: Saving administration costs or saving lives?
• Does the evaluability bias hold when giving to animal charities?
• Loss aversion (simply) does not materialize for smaller losses
• On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages