Increasing and decreasing motor and cognitive output: A model of general action and inaction goals

Dolores Albarracín, Ian M. Handley, Kenji Noguchi, Kathleen C. McCulloch, Hong Li, Joshua Leeper, Rick D. Brown, Allison Earl, William P. Hart

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2008. DOI 10.1037/a0012833

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 4 replications of this study. Recorded outcomes: 3 failed, 1 mixed.

Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of Albarracín et al. (2008), Experiment 7, Corker et al. (2020). Outcome recorded: failed. Results for both protocols were largely consistent with Sonnleitner and Voracek's findings (pseudo- r 2 s = 0.14% and 0.50%). View paper
Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability, Ebersole et al. (2020). Outcome recorded: mixed. 95% CI for the meta-analytic replication includes 0 under the RP:P Protocol but not under the Revised Protocol (effect significant in the same direction as the original only under the Revised Protocol). View paper
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science, unknown authors (2015). Outcome recorded: failed. Coded as not replicated: Replicate = 0 (the project's binary success indicator combining significance and direction). View paper
Eleven years of student replication projects provide evidence on the correlates of replicability in psychology, Boyce et al. (2023). Outcome recorded: failed. Subjective replication success rating = 0 (failed). The replication report rated each sub-outcome on a 0-1 scale; the row is recorded as failed only when all sub-outcomes equal 0, successful only when all equal 1, and mixed for any value strictly between. View paper