Selection bias, vote counting, and money-priming effects: A comment on Rohrer, Pashler, and Harris (2015) and Vohs (2015)
Has this study been replicated?
The atlas records 1 replication and 1 reproduction of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 failed, 1 mixed. The earliest on record is from 2025.
Replications
- SCORE secondary data replication of Vadillo et al. (2016), Loomas et al. (2025). Outcome recorded: failed.
"A binomial test contrasting the observed distribution of p values against a null of .33 power is not statistically significant (p = .991)."
Outcome read from OSF report.
Reproductions
- Analysis, Loomas et al. (2026). Outcome recorded: computationally reproducible, robustness not checked.
Computational: "Analysis attempt 1 is the final analysis performed, because all claims were successfully reproduced at the first attempt." Each of the 6 claims individually states "Based on these criteria, the claim did reproduce."
Outcome read from Computational: Analysis attempt 1 section and per-claim Reproduction outcome statements.
Cite this record
Vadillo, M. A., Hardwicke, T. E., & Shanks, D. R. (2016). Selection bias, vote counting, and money-priming effects: A comment on Rohrer, Pashler, and Harris (2015) and Vohs (2015). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(5), 655–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000157
Other studies in the atlas
Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages