FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

Postretrieval new learning does not reliably induce human memory updating via reconsolidation

Tom E. Hardwicke, Mahdi Taqi, David R. Shanks

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2016. DOI 10.1073/pnas.1601440113

Has this study been replicated?

This paper is itself a replication attempt. The study it set out to replicate is listed below.

Study replicated

• Dissociable stages of human memory consolidation and reconsolidation, Walker et al. (2003). Nature. View paper

Cite this record

Hardwicke, T. E., Taqi, M., & Shanks, D. R. (2016). Postretrieval new learning does not reliably induce human memory updating via reconsolidation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(19), 5206–5211. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601440113

Other studies in the atlas

• Selection bias, vote counting, and money-priming effects: A comment on Rohrer, Pashler…
• Registered Replication Report: Dijksterhuis and van Knippenberg (1998)
• Do Incidental Environmental Anchors Bias Consumers' Price Estimations?
• A single-system account of the relationship between priming, recognition, and fluency
• Can lies be detected unconsciously?
• Replicating the unconscious working memory effect: a multisite Registered Report

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages