FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

The Value of Believing in Free Will

Kathleen D. Vohs, Jonathan W. Schooler

Psychological Science, 2008. DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02045.x

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 3 replications of this study. Recorded outcomes: 3 failed.

Replications

• Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability, Ebersole et al. (2020). Outcome recorded: failed. 95% CI for the meta-analytic replication includes 0 under both the RP:P and Revised Protocols (effect not significant in the same direction as the original under either). View paper
• Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science, unknown authors (2015). Outcome recorded: failed. Coded as not replicated: Replicate = 0 (the project's binary success indicator combining significance and direction). View paper
• Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of Vohs and Schooler (2008), Experiment 1, Buttrick et al. (2020). Outcome recorded: failed. We found that the revisions did not matter. Although the revised measure of belief in free will had better reliability than the original measure, an analysis of the data from the two protocols combined indicated that free-will beliefs were unchanged by the manipulations, d = 0.064, 95% confidence in View paper

Other studies in the atlas

• Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of Vohs and Schooler (2008), Experiment 1
• Temporal Selection is Suppressed, Delayed, and Diffused During the Attentional Blink
• Extremal Edge
• Auditory Change Detection: Simple Sounds Are Not Memorized Better Than Complex Sounds
• Head Up, Foot Down
• The Threat of Appearing Prejudiced and Race-Based Attentional Biases

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages