Anticipating Divine Protection? Reminders of God Can Increase Nonmoral Risk Taking
Has this study been replicated?
The atlas records 2 replications of this study. Recorded outcomes: 2 failed. The earliest on record is from 2020.
Replications
- Eleven years of student replication projects provide evidence on the correlates of replicability in psychology, Boyce et al. (2023). Royal Society Open Science. Outcome recorded: failed.
Subjective replication success rating = 0 (failed). The replication report rated each sub-outcome on a 0-1 scale; the row is recorded as failed only when all sub-outcomes equal 0, successful only when all equal 1, and mixed for any value strictly between.
Outcome read from Supplemental Infromation. View paper - Do Religious Primes Increase Risk Taking? Evidence Against "Anticipating Divine Protection" in Two Preregistered Direct Replications of Kupor, Laurin, and Levav (2015), Gervais et al. (2020). Psychological Science. Outcome recorded: failed.
the totality of evidence speaks against the possibility that religious primes increased nonmoral risk taking in these designs
Outcome read from the abstract. View paper
Cite this record
Kupor, D. M., Laurin, K., & Levav, J. (2015). Anticipating Divine Protection? Reminders of God Can Increase Nonmoral Risk Taking. Psychological Science, 26(4), 374–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614563108
Other studies in the atlas
Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages