FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

Anticipating Divine Protection? Reminders of God Can Increase Nonmoral Risk Taking

Daniella M. Kupor, Kristin Laurin, Jonathan Levav

Psychological Science, 2015. DOI 10.1177/0956797614563108

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 2 replications of this study. Recorded outcomes: 2 failed.

Replications

• Eleven years of student replication projects provide evidence on the correlates of replicability in psychology, Boyce et al. (2023). Outcome recorded: failed. Subjective replication success rating = 0 (failed). The replication report rated each sub-outcome on a 0-1 scale; the row is recorded as failed only when all sub-outcomes equal 0, successful only when all equal 1, and mixed for any value strictly between. View paper
• Do Religious Primes Increase Risk Taking? Evidence Against "Anticipating Divine Protection" in Two Preregistered Direct Replications of Kupor, Laurin, and Levav (2015), Gervais et al. (2020). Outcome recorded: failed. the totality of evidence speaks against the possibility that religious primes increased nonmoral risk taking in these designs View paper

Other studies in the atlas

• Do Religious Primes Increase Risk Taking? Evidence Against "Anticipating Divine Protectio…
• Scarcity Frames Value
• Failing to Forget
• When Does the Future Begin? Time Metrics Matter, Connecting Present and Future Selves
• Capacity for Visual Features in Mental Rotation
• When Knowledge Knows No Bounds

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages