FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

Healthy Out-Group Members Are Represented Psychologically as Infected In-Group Members

Michael Bang Petersen

Psychological Science, 2017. DOI 10.1177/0956797617728270

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 failed.

Replications

• Eleven years of student replication projects provide evidence on the correlates of replicability in psychology, Boyce et al. (2023). Outcome recorded: failed. Our confirmatory analysis did not replicate. We did not find an increase in between-group errors, b=.37, p=.13, 95% CI=[-0.11, 0.84]. That would suggest that participants did not confuse in-group members with out-group members when the presented in-group members were infected. View paper

Other studies in the atlas

• The Link Between Self-Dehumanization and Immoral Behavior
• In Defense of the Commons: Young Children Negatively Evaluate and Sanction Free Riders
• Implicit Theories of Interest: Finding Your Passion or Developing It?
• Inferring Whether Officials Are Corruptible From Looking at Their Faces
• People Make the Same Bayesian Judgment They Criticize in Others
• You That Read Wrong Again! A Transposed-Word Effect in Grammaticality Judgments

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages