Price Subsidies, Diagnostic Tests, and Targeting of Malaria Treatment: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial
Has this study been replicated?
The atlas records 1 replication and 2 reproductions of this study. Recorded outcomes: 2 mixed, 1 successful. The earliest on record is from 2025.
Replications
- SCORE secondary data replication of Cohen et al. (2015), Méndez-Chacón et al. (2025). OSF. Outcome recorded: successful.
"The coefficient for an ACT_SUBSIDY is 0.526 with robust standard errors clustered at the household level of 0.044, significant at the 5% level (p = 0.000). Thus, this replication of the claim was successful according to the SCORE criteria."
Outcome read from OSF report.
Reproductions
- Reproduction (with author data & code): Cohen et al. (2015, American Economic Review), Loomas et al. (2022). OSF. Outcome recorded: computationally reproducible, not checked.
Reproduction outcome: Based on these criteria, the claim did reproduce. (repeated for all 8 claims, with focal coefficients matching within precise reproduction criteria per the tables, e.g. B1 beta=0.2248871 rounded to 0.225)
Outcome read from per-claim Reproduction outcome statements. View paper - Reproduction (with author data & code): Cohen et al. (2015, American Economic Review), Miske et al. (2020). OSF. Outcome recorded: computationally reproducible, not checked.
"The reproduction attempt was successful. The coefficient for "Any ACT subsidy" is 0.1869 with robust standard errors clustered at the household level of 0.0383 p=.000."
Outcome read from Reproduction result. View paper
Cite this record
Cohen, J., Dupas, P., & Schaner, S. (2015). Price Subsidies, Diagnostic Tests, and Targeting of Malaria Treatment: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial. American Economic Review, 105(2), 609–645. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130267
Other studies in the atlas
Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages