Reference

Week 1: What is Open Research

Barker, E., Foka, A., Kiesling, J.B., Konstantinidou, K., Talatas, L., Tsoumari, V. (n.d.). Digital Periegesis: Tracing the places of ancient Greece and the stories associated with them. https://www.periegesis.org/en/

Driver, S. P., Norberg, P., Baldry, I. K., Bamford, S. P., Hopkins, A. M., Liske, J., … & GAMA Team. (2009). GAMA: towards a physical understanding of galaxy formation. Astronomy & Geophysics, 50(5), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4004.2009.50512.x

Education Endowment Foundation. (April 24, 2024). A School’s Guide to Implementation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/guidance-reports/implementation

Farran, E. K., Silverstein, P., Ameen, A. A., Misheva, I., Gilmore, C. (2025). Open Research: Examples of good practice, and resources across disciplines (2025 edition). https://osf.io/preprints/osf/3r8hb

GAMA Team (n.d.): The Galaxy and Mass Assemby (GAMA). https://www.gama-survey.org/

Hanisch, R. & Quinn, P. (2003). The International Virtual Observatory. https://www.ivoa.net/about/TheIVOA.pdf

International Virtual Observatory Alliance. (n.d.). The Virtual Observatory (IVOA). https://www.ivoa.net

Pelagios Network (n.d.). The Pelagios Network. https://pelagios.org

Pelagios Network. (2024). What is linked open data? https://pelagios.org/linked-data

UK Research and Innovation (UKRI). (2025, Apri1 10). Ensuring Open Research. https://www.ukri.org/what-we-do/supporting-healthy-research-and-innovation-culture/open-research/

Wellcome. (n.d.). What is Open research? https://wellcome.org/what-we-do/our-work/research-enviornment/open-research

World Health Organisation. (2024). The mRNA vaccine technology transfer hub. https://www.who.int/initiatives/the-mrna-vaccine-technology-transfer-hub

Week 2: Transparency: As open as possible

Center for Open Science. (2024). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/

Center for Qualitative and Multi-Method Inquiry, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University. (2023). The Qualitative Data Repository. https://qdr.syr.edu/

Creative Commons. (2024). Share your work. https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work

European Organization for Nuclear Research and OpenAIRE. (2024). Zenodo. https://zenodo.org

Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). (2024). Lesson plan 8: open data and qualitative research (lesson template with a CC-By Attribution 4.0 licence). https://osf.io/nyfqx

Kanter, D. (2024). Open data relating to ‘Collecting and connecting portrait sittings: a re-evaluation of portrait-sitting accounts in enhancing knowledge and understanding of British portraiture 1900-1960’. https://doi.org/10.21954/ou.rd.c.6693558

Lia, A., Dowle, A., Taylor, C., Santino, A., & Roversi, P. (2020). Partial catalytic Cys oxidation of human GAPDH to Cys sulfonic acid. https://wellcomeopenresearch.org/articles/5-114/v2

The Open University. (2024). Open Research Data Online (ORDO). https://ordo.open.ac.uk/

Prinizing, M. (2023). Pro-environmental behavior increases subjective well-being: evidence from an experience sampling study and a randomized experiment. https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/ac89k

Play and Learning across a Year (PLAY). (n.d.). https://play-project.org/index.html

Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics (RCSB). (n.d.). Protein Data Bank. https://www.rcsb.org/

Silverstein, P. (2020). Evaluating the replicability and specificity of evidence for natural pedagogy theory. https://www.research.lancs.ac.uk/ portal/ en/ publications/ evaluating-the-replicability-and-specificity-of-evidence-for-natural-pedagogy-theory(39b30b8b-7701-45b9-9009-d2d43bd5a006).html

Week 3: Integrity: Challenging Questionable Research Practices

Camerer, C., Dreber, A., Forsell, E., Ho, T., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., Kirchler, M., Almenberg, J., Altmejd, A., Chan, T., Heikensten, E., Holzmeister, F., Imai, T., Isaksson, S., Nave, G., Pfeiffer, T., Razen, M., & Wu, H. (2016). Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in Economics. Science, 351(6280), 1433-1436. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf0918

Cova, F., Strickland, B., & Abatista, A. (2021). Estimating the reproducibility of experimental philosophy. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 12(1):9-44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325216701_

Ebersole, C. R., Mathur, M. B., Baranski, E., Bart-Plange, D. J., Buttrick, N. R., Chartier, C. R., … & Szecsi, P. (2020). Many Labs 5: Testing pre-data-collection peer review as an intervention to increase replicability. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 2020;3(3):309-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920958687

Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., … & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012

Errington, T. M., Mathur, M., Soderberg, C. K., Denis, A., Perfito, N., Iorns, E., & Nosek, B. A. (2021). Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology. elife, 10, e71601. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71601

Heiss, A. (2025). Hack your way to scientific glory. https://stats.andrewheiss.com/hack-your-way/ recreated from the original from Fifethirtyeight.com, archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20250130080601/https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/p-hacking/

Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). (2024). Lesson plan 8: open data and qualitative research (lesson template with a CC-By Attribution 4.0 licence). https://osf.io/nyfqx

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Culture_s_Consequences.html?id=Cayp_Um4O9gC&redir_esc=y

Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Jr., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., Bocian, K., Brandt, M. J., Brooks, B., Brumbaugh, C. C., Cemalcilar, Z., Chandler, J., Cheong, W., Davis, W. E., Devos, T., Eisner, M., Frankowska, N., Furrow, D., Galliani, E. M., … Nosek, B. A. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A ‘many labs’ replication project. Social Psychology, 45(3), 142–152.
https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178

ManyGoats. (2025). https://www.themanygoatsproject.com/

Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science Science, 349 aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716

Silverstein, P. (2020). Evaluating the replicability and specificity of evidence for natural pedagogy theory. https://www.research.lancs.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/ evaluating-the-replicability-and-specificity-of-evidence-for-natural-pedagogy-theory(39b30b8b-7701-45b9-9009-d2d43bd5a006).html

Silverstein, P., Gliga, T., Westermann, G., & Parise, E. (2019). Probing communication induced biases in preverbal infants: two replication attempts of Yoon, Johnson and Csibra. Infant Behaviour and Development, 55, 77-87. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638318301474?via%3Dihub

Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on Generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123-1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630

UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre. (2021, 14 July). Evidence and Gap Map Research Briefs: UNICEF Strategic Plan 2018–2021 Goal Areas. https://www.unicef.org/innocenti/reports/evidence-and-gap-map-research-briefs

Week 4: Documenting Decisions Transparently

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Network. (2024). Reporting guidelines for main study types. https://www.equator-network.org/

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Network. (2024). What is a reporting guideline? https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/ what-is-a-reporting-guideline/

Open Science Framework. (2024). Registrations and preregistrations. https://help.osf.io/article/330-welcome-to-registrations

Silverstein, P., Gliga, T., Westermann, G., & Parise, E. (2019). Probing communication induced biases in preverbal infants: two replication attempts of Yoon, Johnson and Csibra. Infant Behaviour and Development, 55, 77-87. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638318301474?via%3Dihub

Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

The Open University. (2024). The open research decision tree. https://www.open.edu/openlearncreate/course/view.php?id=11974

von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & STROBE Initiative. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. The Lancet, 370(9596), 1453-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X

Week 5: Integrity: Supporting Robust Interpretations

Heiss, A. (2025). Hack your way to scientific glory. https://stats.andrewheiss.com/hack-your-way/ recreated from the original from Fifethirtyeight.com, archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20250130080601/https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/p-hacking/

Lacy, M. (2017). Just tell me what I need to know: reflexivity and positionality statements. https://medium.com/@Marvette/just-tell-me-what-i-need-to-know-reflexivity-and-positionality-statements-fb52ec0f4e17

The Open University. (2024). The open research decision tree. https://www.open.edu/openlearncreate/course/view.php?id=11974

Week 6: Accessibility: Making your research accessible online

Alperin, J. P. (2015). The public impact of Latin America’s approach to open access. Stanford University. https://stacks.stanford.edu/file/druid:jr256tk1194/AlperinDissertationFinalPublicImpact-augmented.pdf

American Society for Cell Biology. (2024). Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). https://sfdora.org/

Barnes, L. (2018). Green, gold, diamond black – what does it all mean? https://blogs.openbookpublishers.com/green-gold-diamond-black-what-does-it-all-mean/

Butler, L. A., Matthias, L., Simard, M. A., Mongeon, P., & Haustein, S. (2023). The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges. Quantitative Science Studies, 4(4), 778-799. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00272

Center for Open Science (2024): OSF Preprints. https://osf.io/preprints

Coalition, S. (2024). Plan S: making full and immediate open access a reality. https://www.coalition-s.org/

Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory (2024). bioRxiv: the Preprint Server for Biology. https://www.biorxiv.org/

Creative Commons (2024): About CC licenses. https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/cclicenses/

JISC Open Policy Finder. (2025). Open Policy Finder. https://openpolicyfinder.jisc.ac.uk/

Linguistics in Open Access. (2024). Glossa: a journal of general linguistics. https://www.glossa-journal.org/

Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal. (2024). Redalyc. https://www.redalyc.org/

PhilPapers Foundation. (2024). PhilPapers (index and bibliography of philosophy). https://philpapers.org/

SciELO. (2024). Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO). http://scielo.org/en/

Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science. (2024). Preprints - OSF (2024): PsyArXiv. https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv

Week 7: Accessibility: Academic privilege and diversity

ASAPBio. (2024). Publish your reviews. https://asapbio.org/publishyourreviews

CERN. (2024). The Large Hadron Collider. https://home.cern/science/accelerators/large-hadron-collider

Bossu, C., Iniesto, F., Vladimirschi, V, Jordan, K., and Pete, J. (2023). GO-GN: Guidelines for Equity Diversity and Inclusion in Open Education with a focus on Africa and Latin America, Global OER Graduate Network (GO-GN). The Open University (UK). https://go-gn.net/gogn_outputs/edi-guidelines

Bossu, C. & Vladimirschi, V. (2020). Diversity, equity and inclusion in Latin America in the context of an open education initiative, OE Global Connect. https://connect.oeglobal.org/t/diversity-equity-and-inclusion-in-latin-america-in-the-context-of-an-open-education-initiative/387

Elsherif, M., Middleton, S., Azevedo, F., Iley, B., Grosse-Hodge, M., Tyler, S., Kapp, S., Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, A., Grafton-Clark, D., Yeung, S., Shaw, J., Hartmann, H., & Dokovova, M. (2022). Bridging neurodiversity and open scholarship: how shared values can guide best practices for research integrity, social justice, and principled education. MetaArXiv Preprints. https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/k7a9p

Farran, E. K., Silverstein, P., Ameen, A. A., Misheva, I., Gilmore, C. Open Research: examples of good practice and resources across disciplines. https://osf.io/preprints/osf/3r8hb

Iniesto, F. & Bossu, C. (2023). Equity, diversity, and inclusion in open education: A systematic literature review. Distance Education, 44:4, 694-711. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2023.2267472

Kathawalla, U., Silverstone, P., & Syed, M. (2021). Easing into open science: a guide for graduate students and their advisors. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.18684

ManyPrimates. (n.d.). Many Primates. https://manyprimates.github.io/

ManyPrimates. (2019). Collaborative open science as a way to reproducibility and new insights in primate cognition research. Japanese Psychological Review, Vol. 62, No. 3, 205-220.
https://manyprimates.github.io/assets/pdfs/ManyPrimates_JPR_2019.pdf

The Many Babies Consortium. (2024). Many Babies. https://manybabies.org/

The National Human Genome Research Institute. (2024). The Human Genome Project. https://www.genome.gov/human-genome-project

Octopus. (2025). Octopus. https://www.octopus.ac/

Pelagios Network. (2024). The Pelagios Network. https://pelagios.org/

The Psychological Science Accelerator. (n.d.). About. https://psysciacc.org/about.html

Society for the Improvement of Psychological Sciences. (2024). How to manage big team science projects in psychology.
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/15s7Mo7GMb7Jjs6i-Cl2sF4KmOPx8X6eoilyhhcNGHGw/edit#slide=id.p

Week 8: Committing to open research

Center for Open Science. (2024). OSF Preprints. https://osf.io/preprints

Farran, E. K., Silverstein, P., Ameen, A. A., Misheva, I., Gilmore, C. (2025). Open Research: Examples of good practice, and resources across disciplines (2025 edition). https://osf.io/preprints/osf/3r8hb

Kathawalla, U., Silverstone, P., & Syed, M. (2021). Easing into open science: a guide for graduate students and their advisors. University of California Press. https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/bjop.12700

Silverstein, P., Pennington, C., Branney, P., O’Connor, D., Lawlor, E., O’Brien, E., & Lynott, D. (2024). A registered report survey of open research practices in psychology departments in the UK and Ireland. British Journal of Psychology, 115: 497-534
https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ bjop.12700

Silverstein, P. (2025). Nowhere Lab. http://nowherelab.com/

The Open University. (2024). Open Research Data Online (ORDO). https://ordo.open.ac.uk/

The Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORTT). (n.d.) https://forrt.org/

UbuntuNet Alliance (2024): AfricArxiv. https://info.africarxiv.org/

UK Reproducibility Network (2024). Open research across disciplines. https://www.ukrn.org/

 

© 2025 - FORRT

Unless otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a CC BY NC SA 4.0 license