FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

Implicit Science Stereotypes Mediate the Relationship between Gender and Academic Participation

Kristin A. Lane, Jin X. Goh, Erin Driver-Linn

Sex Roles, 2011. DOI 10.1007/s11199-011-0036-z

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 mixed.

Replications

• What Is the Implicit Gender-Science Stereotype? Exploring Correlations Between the Gender-Science IAT and Self-Report Measures, Zitelny et al. (2017). Outcome recorded: statistically successful but flawed. In a reanalysis of a previous study and a replication of another study, we found that evidence for the IAT's advantage over explicit stereotypes in predicting relevant outcomes disappeared when controlling for self-reported liking. View paper

Other studies in the atlas

• What Is the Implicit Gender-Science Stereotype? Exploring Correlations Between the Gender…
• The Actor–Observer Bias and Moral Intuitions: Adding Fuel to Sinnott-Armstrong's Fire
• The Lesson of Bypassing
• Attitudes Towards Reference and Replaceability
• Further Analysis of the Response Deprivation Hypothesis: Application of the Disequilibriu…
• Increasing Toy Engagement via Response Disequilibrium Theory: A Systematic Replication

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages