FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

Implicit Science Stereotypes Mediate the Relationship between Gender and Academic Participation

Kristin A. Lane, Jin X. Goh, Erin Driver-Linn

Sex Roles, 2011. DOI 10.1007/s11199-011-0036-z

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 mixed. The earliest on record is from 2017.

Replications

• What Is the Implicit Gender-Science Stereotype? Exploring Correlations Between the Gender-Science IAT and Self-Report Measures, Zitelny et al. (2017). Social Psychological and Personality Science. Outcome recorded: statistically successful but flawed. In a reanalysis of a previous study and a replication of another study, we found that evidence for the IAT's advantage over explicit stereotypes in predicting relevant outcomes disappeared when controlling for self-reported liking. View paper

Cite this record

Lane, K. A., Goh, J. X., & Driver-Linn, E. (2011). Implicit Science Stereotypes Mediate the Relationship between Gender and Academic Participation. Sex Roles, 66(3–4), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0036-z

Other studies in the atlas

• Improving Teachers' Knowledge of Functional Assessment-based Interventions: Outcomes of…
• Improving Educators' Knowledge, Confidence, and Usefulness of Functional…
• Empowering Teachers With Low-Intensity Strategies to Support Instruction: Implementing…
• Associations between firearm and suicide rates: a replication of Kleck (2021)
• Interpersonal Problems and Negative Affect in Borderline Personality and Depressive…
• Interpersonal stressors and negative affect in individuals with borderline personality…

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages