What Counts as a Choice?
Has this study been replicated?
The atlas records 3 replications and 1 reproduction of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 failed, 1 mixed, 1 successful, 1 with no outcome recorded.
Replications
- Eleven years of student replication projects provide evidence on the correlates of replicability in psychology, Boyce et al. (2023). Outcome recorded: failed.
Subjective replication success rating = 0 (failed). The replication report rated each sub-outcome on a 0-1 scale; the row is recorded as failed only when all sub-outcomes equal 0, successful only when all equal 1, and mixed for any value strictly between.
View paper - Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings, Klein et al. (2018). Outcome recorded: mixed.
Though there was a significant main effect in the full sample, the absence of a significant main effect in this subsample, control- ling for importance, is inconsistent with the original finding that Indians are less likely to construe personal actions than interpersonal actions as choices. There
View paper - SCORE new data replication of Savani et al. (2010), Safin et al. (2025). Outcome recorded: successful.
"The H focal test (two-way ANOVA) confirms a significant interaction, F(1,444) = 19.51, p = 1.26 × 10⁻⁵ in the predicted direction, such that Indian participants had fewer clicks than Americans in the experimental 'Choice' condition, but not in the control condition. The results are remarkably simil
Reproductions
- Reproduction (with author data & code): Savani et al. (2010, Psychological Science), Fox et al. (2020). No outcome recorded. View paper
Other studies in the atlas
Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages