FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015

Colin F. Camerer, Anna Dreber, Felix Holzmeister, Teck-Hua Ho, Jürgen Huber, Magnus Johannesson, Michael Kirchler, Gideon Nave, Brian A. Nosek, Thomas Pfeiffer, Adam Altmejd, Nick Buttrick, Taizan Chan, Yiling Chen, Eskil Forsell, Anup Gampa, Emma Heikensten, Lily Hummer, Taisuke Imai, Siri Isaksson, Dylan Manfredi, Julia Rose, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Hang Wu

Nature Human Behaviour, 2018. DOI 10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 failed.

Replications

• Empirical audit and review and an assessment of evidentiary value in research on the psychological consequences of scarcity, O'Donnell et al. (2021). Outcome recorded: failed. An ANOVA predicting participants responses to the Dots-Mixed task revealed that poor participants (Mpoor = 41.56, SDpoor = 16.79) performed no worse than rich participants (Mrich = 42.82, SDrich = 15.87) F(1,666) = .99, p=.319. View paper

Other studies in the atlas

• Experimental evidence for the influence of group size on cultural complexity
• Cooperating with the future
• Inequality and visibility of wealth in experimental social networks
• How warm days increase belief in global warming
• A common variant associated with prostate cancer in European and African populations
• Chromosome 8q24 variants are associated with prostate cancer risk in a high risk populati…

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages