Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015
Has this study been replicated?
The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 failed. The earliest on record is from 2021.
Replications
- Empirical audit and review and an assessment of evidentiary value in research on the psychological consequences of scarcity, O'Donnell et al. (2021). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Outcome recorded: failed.
An ANOVA predicting participants responses to the Dots-Mixed task revealed that poor participants (Mpoor = 41.56, SDpoor = 16.79) performed no worse than rich participants (Mrich = 42.82, SDrich = 15.87) F(1,666) = .99, p=.319.
Outcome read from SM p. 28. View paper
Studies replicated
- Spontaneous giving and calculated greed, Rand et al. (2012). Nature. View paper
- Experimental evidence for the influence of group size on cultural complexity, Derex et al. (2013). Nature. View paper
- Cooperating with the future, Hauser et al. (2014). Nature. View paper
- Inequality and visibility of wealth in experimental social networks, Nishi et al. (2015). Nature. View paper
- Lab Experiments for the Study of Social-Ecological Systems, Janssen et al. (2010). Science. View paper
- Washing Away Postdecisional Dissonance, Lee & Schwarz (2010). Science. View paper
- Incidental Haptic Sensations Influence Social Judgments and Decisions, Ackerman et al. (2010). Science. View paper
- The Social Sense: Susceptibility to Others' Beliefs in Human Infants and Adults, Kovács et al. (2010). Science. View paper
- Why Testing Improves Memory: Mediator Effectiveness Hypothesis, Pyc & Rawson (2010). Science. View paper
- Thought for Food: Imagined Consumption Reduces Actual Consumption, Morewedge et al. (2010). Science. View paper
- Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping, Karpicke & Blunt (2011). Science. View paper
- Writing About Testing Worries Boosts Exam Performance in the Classroom, Ramirez & Beilock (2011). Science. View paper
- Google Effects on Memory: Cognitive Consequences of Having Information at Our Fingertips, Sparrow et al. (2011). Science. View paper
- Affirmative Action Policies Promote Women and Do Not Harm Efficiency in the Laboratory, Balafoutas & Sutter (2012). Science. View paper
- Analytic Thinking Promotes Religious Disbelief, Gervais & Norenzayan (2012). Science. View paper
- Memory's Penumbra: Episodic Memory Decisions Induce Lingering Mnemonic Biases, Duncan et al. (2012). Science. View paper
- Some Consequences of Having Too Little, Shah et al. (2012). Science. View paper
- Body Cues, Not Facial Expressions, Discriminate Between Intense Positive and Negative Emotions, Aviezer et al. (2012). Science. View paper
- Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind, Kidd & Castano (2013). Science. View paper
- Just think: The challenges of the disengaged mind, Wilson et al. (2014). Science. View paper
- Avoiding overhead aversion in charity, Gneezy et al. (2014). Science. View paper
Cite this record
Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Holzmeister, F., Ho, T.-H., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., Kirchler, M., Nave, G., Nosek, B. A., Pfeiffer, T., Altmejd, A., Buttrick, N., Chan, T., Chen, Y., Forsell, E., Gampa, A., Heikensten, E., Hummer, L., Imai, T., … Wu, H. (2018). Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(9), 637–644. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z Individual report available at https://osf.io/szcuk
Other studies in the atlas
Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages